lSUV eSjh ifCyd Ldwy :Mdh jksM dejk uacj 3 PS 191
Kapil Dev Agarwal
BJPBJP576 votes at this polling station
over Saurabh (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 576 | 89.16% | |
| 2 | Saurabh | RLD | 47 | 7.28% | |
| 3 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 10 | 1.55% | |
| 4 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 8 | 1.24% | |
| 5 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 6 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 7 | Rajnish | RSP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 646 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 576 | 89.16% | 1 | 44 | Strong |
| RLD | 47 | 7.28% | 2 | 288 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 1.55% | 3 | 126 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.24% | 4 | 47 | Poor |
| BLSP | 2 | 0.31% | 5 | 24 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 6 | 185 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 291 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 103 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 279 | Poor |
| AKR | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 283 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.