fe'ku ifCyd Ldwy eYgwiqjk d0u0 2 PS 181
Saurabh
RLDRLD465 votes at this polling station
over Kapil Dev Agarwal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 465 | 83.33% | |
| 2 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 40 | 7.17% | |
| 3 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 13 | 2.33% | |
| 4 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 7 | 1.25% | |
| 5 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 6 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 5 | 0.90% | |
| 7 | Rajnish | RSP | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 9 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 10 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 11 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 12 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 13 | Samay Singh | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 14 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 15 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 558 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 465 | 83.04% | 1 | 96 | Strong |
| BJP | 40 | 7.14% | 2 | 282 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 13 | 2.32% | 3 | 106 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 2.32% | 4 | 41 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.25% | 5 | 146 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 1.07% | 6 | 5 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.89% | 7 | 133 | Poor |
| AKR | 3 | 0.54% | 8 | 73 | Poor |
| BLSP | 3 | 0.54% | 9 | 9 | Poor |
| RSP | 3 | 0.54% | 10 | 39 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.