turk dU;k fo|ky; dsoyiqjh dejk uacj&5 PS 170
Saurabh
RLDRLD438 votes at this polling station
over Kapil Dev Agarwal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 438 | 67.59% | |
| 2 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 142 | 21.91% | |
| 3 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 43 | 6.64% | |
| 4 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 10 | 1.54% | |
| 5 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 8 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 648 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 438 | 67.59% | 1 | 100 | Strong |
| BJP | 142 | 21.91% | 2 | 251 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 43 | 6.64% | 3 | 11 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.70% | 4 | 55 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.93% | 5 | 98 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.62% | 6 | 26 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.46% | 7 | 221 | Poor |
| AKR | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 158 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 234 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 245 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.