ljkstuh nsoh b.Vj dkWyst jkeiqjh d0u0&2 PS 155
Kapil Dev Agarwal
BJPBJP563 votes at this polling station
over Saurabh (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 563 | 84.28% | |
| 2 | Saurabh | RLD | 87 | 13.02% | |
| 3 | Rajnish | RSP | 9 | 1.35% | |
| 4 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 5 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 6 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 7 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 668 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 563 | 84.03% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| RLD | 87 | 12.99% | 2 | 219 | Weak |
| RSP | 9 | 1.34% | 3 | 7 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 0.75% | 4 | 180 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.45% | 5 | 198 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.15% | 6 | 326 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 228 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 295 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 265 | Poor |
| AKR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 266 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.