tokgj izkFkfed fo|ky; Vhu 'kSM dejk uacj&2 PS 133
Saurabh
RLDRLD676 votes at this polling station
over Mohammed Intezar (AIMIM)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 676 | 92.22% | |
| 2 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 17 | 2.32% | |
| 3 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 11 | 1.50% | |
| 4 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 5 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | Rajnish | RSP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 733 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 676 | 91.97% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| AIMIM | 17 | 2.31% | 2 | 85 | Poor |
| BJP | 11 | 1.50% | 3 | 331 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.22% | 4 | 81 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.68% | 5 | 130 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.54% | 6 | 23 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.54% | 7 | 197 | Poor |
| RSP | 4 | 0.54% | 8 | 24 | Poor |
| AKR | 3 | 0.41% | 9 | 65 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 214 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.