tokgj izkFkfed fo|ky; Vhu 'kSM dejk uacj&1 PS 132
Saurabh
RLDRLD653 votes at this polling station
over Mohammed Intezar (AIMIM)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 653 | 91.97% | |
| 2 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 22 | 3.10% | |
| 3 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 10 | 1.41% | |
| 4 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 6 | 0.85% | |
| 5 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | Samay Singh | IND | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 710 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 653 | 91.84% | 1 | 24 | Strong |
| AIMIM | 22 | 3.09% | 2 | 68 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.55% | 3 | 54 | Poor |
| BJP | 10 | 1.41% | 4 | 336 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.84% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| AKR | 4 | 0.56% | 6 | 46 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.42% | 7 | 42 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 300 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 213 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 231 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.