GOVERNMENT ANIMAL CHIKITISHALAYE ROOM NO. 2 PS 251
Suresh Kumar Khanna
SPSP441 votes at this polling station
over Tanveer Khan (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suresh Kumar Khanna | SP | 441 | 82.74% | |
| 2 | Tanveer Khan | SP | 81 | 15.20% | |
| 3 | Smt. Poonam | INC | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 4 | Sarvesh Chandra Dhandhu | BSP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 5 | Manoj Kumar | RSP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 6 | Rajiv Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Rajeev Kumar Saxena | BKD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Ram Dayal | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Rahul Mohan | LRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Shahadeva Kumar | SDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ajay Meera Pandey | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Aradhana | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Lokesh Srivastava | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Wakar Ahamad Khan | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Sanjay Kumar | INDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 533 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 522 | 96.13% | 1 | 192 | Strong |
| INC | 7 | 1.29% | 2 | 43 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.55% | 3 | 312 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.18% | 4 | 234 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 285 | Poor |
| INDP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 389 | Poor |
| LRV | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 284 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 279 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 314 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 280 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 135, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.