DON 0amp; DONA CONVENT SCHOOL ROOM NO. 1 PS 229
Tanveer Khan
SPSP393 votes at this polling station
over Suresh Kumar Khanna (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tanveer Khan | SP | 393 | 62.58% | |
| 2 | Suresh Kumar Khanna | SP | 208 | 33.12% | |
| 3 | Sarvesh Chandra Dhandhu | BSP | 22 | 3.50% | |
| 4 | Smt. Poonam | INC | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 5 | Manoj Kumar | RSP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 6 | Wakar Ahamad Khan | INDP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | Sanjay Kumar | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Rajiv Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Rajeev Kumar Saxena | BKD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Ram Dayal | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rahul Mohan | LRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Shahadeva Kumar | SDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ajay Meera Pandey | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Aradhana | INDP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Lokesh Srivastava | INDP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 628 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 601 | 95.70% | 1 | 93 | Strong |
| BSP | 22 | 3.50% | 2 | 113 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.32% | 3 | 257 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.32% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| INDP | 1 | 0.16% | 5 | 315 | Poor |
| LRV | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 265 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 266 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 258 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 298 | Poor |
| BKD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 259 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 135, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.