MITING HAAL WEST PS 40
ROSHAN LAL VERMA
SPSP542 votes at this polling station
over SALONA KUSHWAHA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROSHAN LAL VERMA | SP | 542 | 82.12% | |
| 2 | SALONA KUSHWAHA | BJP | 98 | 14.85% | |
| 3 | NAWAB FAIZAN ALI KHAN | BSP | 8 | 1.21% | |
| 4 | RAJNISH GUPTA | INC | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 5 | NOKHEY LAL | CPI | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 6 | ABHISHEK SINGH KUSHWAHA | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | HARISHCHANDRA SHARMA | BSS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV | BKD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | VISHAMBAR DAYAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SARITA YADAV | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SAKIR | LRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | BABU SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RAM ASEREY | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | SUMIT SRIVASTAV | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 660 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 542 | 82.12% | 1 | 9 | Strong |
| BJP | 98 | 14.85% | 2 | 365 | Weak |
| BSP | 8 | 1.21% | 3 | 243 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.61% | 4 | 213 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.45% | 5 | 153 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.30% | 6 | 339 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| BKD | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 247 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 218 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 201 | Poor |
| LRV | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 179 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 202 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 133, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.