प्राथमिक विद्यालय नं0-1 जसौई कमरा नंबर 1 PS 168
Pankaj Kumar Malik
SPSP498 votes at this polling station
over Sapna Kashyap (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pankaj Kumar Malik | SP | 498 | 69.65% | |
| 2 | Sapna Kashyap | BJP | 180 | 25.17% | |
| 3 | Tahir Husain Ansari | AIMIM | 21 | 2.94% | |
| 4 | Yasmeen Rao | INC | 6 | 0.84% | |
| 5 | Saleem Malik | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 6 | Tarun Singh | ASP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | Salman Sayeed | BSP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | Kapil Kumar | RSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Sangeeta | JSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Ajay Kashyap | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Abhishek | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Chanderveer | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Yawar Roshan | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 715 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 498 | 68.60% | 1 | 57 | Strong |
| BJP | 180 | 24.79% | 2 | 215 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 21 | 2.89% | 3 | 56 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.83% | 4 | 39 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.55% | 5 | 133 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.28% | 6 | 68 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 301 | Poor |
| JSP | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 61 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 121 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 213 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 12, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.