PR. SCHOOL PIPRAUL PUKHTA ROOM NO. 2 PS 254
Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA
BJPBJP221 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA | BJP | 221 | 59.89% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA | SP | 91 | 24.66% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA | BSP | 41 | 11.11% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name KISHOR KUMAR | RSSP | 4 | 1.08% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name VEER PAL SINGH | RPD | 3 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name SHAILENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | JDL | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name ANKIT CHAUHAN | INC | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name MIR HADI ALI URF BABAR MIYAN | ASPK | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name DEENANATH | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name RAJARAM SHAKYA | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name DEVENDRA | AAP | 1 | 0.27% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 369 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 221 | 59.41% | 1 | 207 | Strong |
| SP | 91 | 24.46% | 2 | 262 | Weak |
| BSP | 41 | 11.02% | 3 | 207 | Weak |
| RSSP | 4 | 1.08% | 4 | 127 | Poor |
| RPD | 3 | 0.81% | 5 | 158 | Poor |
| ASPK | 2 | 0.54% | 6 | 125 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.54% | 7 | 302 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.54% | 8 | 255 | Poor |
| JDL | 2 | 0.54% | 9 | 140 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.27% | 10 | 200 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 114, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.