PR. SCHOOL KURBANPUR ROOM NO. 1 PS 243
Candidate Name MIR HADI ALI URF BABAR MIYAN
ASPKASPK212 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name MIR HADI ALI URF BABAR MIYAN | ASPK | 212 | 51.08% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA | BSP | 80 | 19.28% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA | BJP | 42 | 10.12% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA | SP | 35 | 8.43% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name VEER PAL SINGH | RPD | 27 | 6.51% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name DEVENDRA | AAP | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name DEENANATH | IND | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name RAJARAM SHAKYA | IND | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name ANKIT CHAUHAN | INC | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name SHAILENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | JDL | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name KISHOR KUMAR | RSSP | 1 | 0.24% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 415 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPK | 212 | 50.36% | 1 | 4 | Strong |
| BSP | 80 | 19.00% | 2 | 142 | Weak |
| BJP | 42 | 9.98% | 3 | 361 | Poor |
| SP | 35 | 8.31% | 4 | 355 | Poor |
| RPD | 27 | 6.41% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.90% | 6 | 21 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.19% | 7 | 26 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.95% | 8 | 191 | Poor |
| JDL | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 229 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 310 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 114, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.