PR. SCHOOL SUJATGANJ PACHTAUR ROOM NO 1 PS 229
Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA
SPSP341 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA | SP | 341 | 50.29% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA | BJP | 285 | 42.04% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA | BSP | 26 | 3.83% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name MIR HADI ALI URF BABAR MIYAN | ASPK | 9 | 1.33% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name VEER PAL SINGH | RPD | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name RAJARAM SHAKYA | IND | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name ANKIT CHAUHAN | INC | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name KISHOR KUMAR | RSSP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name SHAILENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | JDL | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name DEENANATH | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name DEVENDRA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 678 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 341 | 50.15% | 1 | 48 | Strong |
| BJP | 285 | 41.91% | 2 | 143 | Strong |
| BSP | 26 | 3.82% | 3 | 249 | Poor |
| ASPK | 9 | 1.32% | 4 | 32 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.74% | 5 | 87 | Poor |
| RPD | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 92 | Poor |
| RSSP | 3 | 0.44% | 8 | 181 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.44% | 7 | 235 | Poor |
| JDL | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 226 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 328 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 114, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.