PR. SCHOOL GANGGAPUR ROOM NO 1 PS 226
Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA
BSPBSP279 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA | BSP | 279 | 43.80% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA | SP | 231 | 36.26% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA | BJP | 90 | 14.13% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name VEER PAL SINGH | RPD | 15 | 2.35% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name RAJARAM SHAKYA | IND | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name MIR HADI ALI URF BABAR MIYAN | ASPK | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name ANKIT CHAUHAN | INC | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name SHAILENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | JDL | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name DEENANATH | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name DEVENDRA | AAP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name KISHOR KUMAR | RSSP | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 637 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 279 | 43.19% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| SP | 231 | 35.76% | 2 | 105 | Average |
| BJP | 90 | 13.93% | 3 | 332 | Weak |
| RPD | 15 | 2.32% | 4 | 35 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.24% | 5 | 19 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.62% | 7 | 188 | Poor |
| ASPK | 4 | 0.62% | 6 | 66 | Poor |
| JDL | 3 | 0.46% | 8 | 72 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 95 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 308 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 114, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.