PR. SCHOOL AFZALPUR CHHAGANPUR ROOM NO 1 PS 161
Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA
SPSP355 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name CHANDRA PRAKASH MAURYA | SP | 355 | 69.61% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name HARISH CHANDRA | BJP | 97 | 19.02% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name MAMTA SHAKYA | BSP | 23 | 4.51% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name ANKIT CHAUHAN | INC | 12 | 2.35% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name MIR HADI ALI URF BABAR MIYAN | ASPK | 11 | 2.16% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name SHAILENDRA KUMAR MISHRA | JDL | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name DEVENDRA | AAP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name VEER PAL SINGH | RPD | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name KISHOR KUMAR | RSSP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name RAJARAM SHAKYA | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name DEENANATH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 510 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 355 | 69.07% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| BJP | 97 | 18.87% | 2 | 328 | Weak |
| BSP | 23 | 4.47% | 3 | 256 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 2.33% | 4 | 22 | Poor |
| ASPK | 11 | 2.14% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| JDL | 5 | 0.97% | 6 | 18 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.58% | 7 | 49 | Poor |
| RPD | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 202 | Poor |
| RSSP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 295 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 297 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 114, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.