P.P.BHURIGAWAN ROOM NO.. 2 PS 71
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party330 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 330 | 59.67% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 207 | 37.43% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 7 | 1.27% | |
| 4 | Tara Rajput | INC | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 5 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 6 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 7 | Amit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 553 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 330 | 59.03% | 1 | 132 | Strong |
| SP | 207 | 37.03% | 2 | 146 | Average |
| BSP | 7 | 1.25% | 3 | 197 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.54% | 4 | 177 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.36% | 5 | 144 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.36% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 38 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 28 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 295 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 155 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 130 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.