P.P.MILAWALI SECOND ROOM NO. 2 PS 340
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party297 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 297 | 70.05% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 96 | 22.64% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 14 | 3.30% | |
| 4 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 7 | 1.65% | |
| 5 | Amit Kumar | IND | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | Mukesh | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | Tara Rajput | INC | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 424 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 297 | 69.56% | 1 | 158 | Strong |
| SP | 96 | 22.48% | 2 | 225 | Weak |
| BSP | 14 | 3.28% | 3 | 173 | Poor |
| JAP | 7 | 1.64% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.41% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| RBP | 2 | 0.47% | 6 | 16 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 296 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 259 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 351 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 357 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 356 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.