P.P.MARTHARA BHAGWANDAS ROOM NO. 1 PS 332
Amit Gaurav
SPSamajwadi Party274 votes at this polling station
over Virendra Singh Lodhi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 274 | 53.52% | |
| 2 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 218 | 42.58% | |
| 3 | Tara Rajput | INC | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 4 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 5 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 6 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 7 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 8 | Amit Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | Mukesh | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 512 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 274 | 53.20% | 1 | 125 | Strong |
| BJP | 218 | 42.33% | 2 | 206 | Strong |
| IND | 7 | 1.36% | 3 | 63 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.78% | 4 | 68 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.58% | 5 | 99 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.58% | 6 | 267 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.39% | 7 | 46 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 81 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 350 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 346 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 348 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.