P.P. KHERIYA KALA ROOM NO. 1 PS 317
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party350 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 350 | 77.26% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 85 | 18.76% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 11 | 2.43% | |
| 4 | Amit Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 5 | Mukesh | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 6 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 7 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | Tara Rajput | INC | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 453 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 350 | 77.26% | 1 | 117 | Strong |
| SP | 85 | 18.76% | 2 | 238 | Weak |
| BSP | 11 | 2.43% | 3 | 182 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.88% | 4 | 158 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.22% | 6 | 291 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 139 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 5 | 250 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 333 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 339 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 334 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.