P.P.RARPATTI ROOM NO. 1 PS 281
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party336 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 336 | 68.99% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 134 | 27.52% | |
| 3 | Amit Kumar | IND | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 4 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 5 | Tara Rajput | INC | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 6 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 7 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | Mukesh | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 487 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 336 | 68.57% | 1 | 128 | Strong |
| SP | 134 | 27.35% | 2 | 182 | Average |
| IND | 6 | 1.22% | 3 | 83 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.61% | 4 | 264 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.41% | 6 | 184 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.41% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 240 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 70 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 128 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 56 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 312 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.