P.P.ASRAULI ROOM NO. 2 PS 265
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party489 votes at this polling station
over Yogesh Kumar (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 489 | 80.30% | |
| 2 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 57 | 9.36% | |
| 3 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 53 | 8.70% | |
| 4 | Tara Rajput | INC | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 5 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 6 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Amit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 609 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 489 | 80.16% | 1 | 64 | Strong |
| BSP | 57 | 9.34% | 2 | 101 | Poor |
| SP | 53 | 8.69% | 3 | 302 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.33% | 4 | 266 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.33% | 5 | 179 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 124 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 54 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 64 | Poor |
| VPI | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 69 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 236 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.