P.P. KAKRAWALI ROOM NO. 1 PS 258
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party376 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 376 | 61.34% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 231 | 37.68% | |
| 3 | Tara Rajput | INC | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 4 | Amit Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 5 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 6 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 613 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 376 | 61.14% | 1 | 104 | Strong |
| SP | 231 | 37.56% | 2 | 137 | Average |
| IND | 3 | 0.49% | 3 | 199 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.33% | 4 | 176 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 5 | 234 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 291 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 374 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 303 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 295 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 321 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 289 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.