P.P.KUNVARPUR CHANDRABHANPUR PS 247
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party451 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 451 | 76.31% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 108 | 18.27% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 20 | 3.38% | |
| 4 | Amit Kumar | IND | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 5 | Tara Rajput | INC | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 6 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 591 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 451 | 75.93% | 1 | 74 | Strong |
| SP | 108 | 18.18% | 2 | 206 | Weak |
| BSP | 20 | 3.37% | 3 | 160 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.84% | 4 | 115 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.34% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| VPI | 2 | 0.34% | 6 | 15 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 118 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 233 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 55 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 293 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 279 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.