P.M.V.GAHETU ROOM NO. 2 PS 243
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party198 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 198 | 55.15% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 149 | 41.50% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 4 | 1.11% | |
| 4 | Tara Rajput | INC | 3 | 0.84% | |
| 5 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 6 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | Amit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 359 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 198 | 55.00% | 1 | 225 | Strong |
| SP | 149 | 41.39% | 2 | 165 | Strong |
| BSP | 4 | 1.11% | 3 | 240 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.83% | 4 | 109 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.56% | 6 | 262 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.56% | 5 | 150 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 54 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 309 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 276 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 290 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 283 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.