P.P.FATEHPUR KHALSA PS 224
Amit Gaurav
SPSamajwadi Party104 votes at this polling station
over Yogesh Kumar (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 104 | 39.10% | |
| 2 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 83 | 31.20% | |
| 3 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 67 | 25.19% | |
| 4 | Tara Rajput | INC | 4 | 1.50% | |
| 5 | Amit Kumar | IND | 3 | 1.13% | |
| 6 | Mukesh | IND | 2 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 8 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 266 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 104 | 38.95% | 1 | 213 | Average |
| BSP | 83 | 31.09% | 2 | 76 | Average |
| BJP | 67 | 25.09% | 3 | 303 | Average |
| IND | 6 | 2.25% | 4 | 77 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.50% | 5 | 60 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.37% | 7 | 111 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.37% | 6 | 49 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 346 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 271 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 269 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 259 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.