P.P.BANTHAL KUTUBPUR ROOM NO. 2 PS 176
Amit Gaurav
SPSamajwadi Party528 votes at this polling station
over Virendra Singh Lodhi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 528 | 81.11% | |
| 2 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 100 | 15.36% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 21 | 3.23% | |
| 4 | Mukesh | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 5 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 6 | Tara Rajput | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Amit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 651 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 528 | 80.73% | 1 | 46 | Strong |
| BJP | 100 | 15.29% | 2 | 279 | Weak |
| BSP | 21 | 3.21% | 3 | 156 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.31% | 4 | 250 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 343 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 268 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 219 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 236 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 234 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 329 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 227 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.