P.P. SHYORAI ROOM NO. 1 PS 163
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party294 votes at this polling station
over Yogesh Kumar (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 294 | 56.32% | |
| 2 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 113 | 21.65% | |
| 3 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 107 | 20.50% | |
| 4 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 4 | 0.77% | |
| 5 | Tara Rajput | INC | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 6 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | Amit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | Mukesh | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 522 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 294 | 55.79% | 1 | 160 | Strong |
| BSP | 113 | 21.44% | 2 | 52 | Weak |
| SP | 107 | 20.30% | 3 | 209 | Weak |
| AAP | 4 | 0.76% | 4 | 36 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.38% | 5 | 246 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.19% | 6 | 251 | Poor |
| VPI | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 50 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 258 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 207 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 214 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 224 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.