P.P.SURATPUR MAFI ROOM NO. 2 PS 157
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party229 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 229 | 57.39% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 161 | 40.35% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 4 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 5 | Tara Rajput | INC | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 6 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 7 | Amit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 399 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 229 | 57.11% | 1 | 195 | Strong |
| SP | 161 | 40.15% | 2 | 159 | Strong |
| BSP | 3 | 0.75% | 3 | 255 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.50% | 4 | 242 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.25% | 6 | 249 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 94 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 53 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 5 | 216 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 209 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 220 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 203 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.