P.P.LODHAMAI ROOM NO. 2 PS 143
Amit Gaurav
SPSamajwadi Party148 votes at this polling station
over Virendra Singh Lodhi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 148 | 36.72% | |
| 2 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 145 | 35.98% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 105 | 26.05% | |
| 4 | Tara Rajput | INC | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 5 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 6 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 7 | Mukesh | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Amit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 403 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 148 | 36.72% | 1 | 166 | Average |
| BJP | 145 | 35.98% | 2 | 256 | Average |
| BSP | 105 | 26.05% | 3 | 59 | Average |
| INC | 2 | 0.50% | 4 | 157 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 39 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.25% | 6 | 313 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 5 | 212 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 199 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 249 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 208 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 208 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.