P.P.RASOOLPUR GADHAULI ROOM NO. 1 PS 129
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party670 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 670 | 88.86% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 75 | 9.95% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 5 | 0.66% | |
| 4 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 5 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 6 | Tara Rajput | INC | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 7 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Amit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mukesh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 754 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 670 | 88.86% | 1 | 11 | Strong |
| SP | 75 | 9.95% | 2 | 254 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 0.66% | 3 | 218 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.27% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.13% | 5 | 311 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.13% | 6 | 239 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 241 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 180 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 189 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 199 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 200 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.