P.P.KAPRAITA ROOM NO. 2 PS 109
Virendra Singh Lodhi
BJPBharatiya Janata Party289 votes at this polling station
over Amit Gaurav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 289 | 44.46% | |
| 2 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 271 | 41.69% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 75 | 11.54% | |
| 4 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 5 | Tara Rajput | INC | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | Amit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | Mukesh | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 650 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 289 | 44.12% | 1 | 164 | Strong |
| SP | 271 | 41.37% | 2 | 127 | Strong |
| BSP | 75 | 11.45% | 3 | 86 | Weak |
| AAP | 5 | 0.76% | 4 | 22 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.76% | 5 | 105 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.61% | 6 | 51 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 46 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 184 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 171 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 228 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 164 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.