P.P.MUHIUDDINPUR ROOM NO. 1 PS 100
Amit Gaurav
SPSamajwadi Party297 votes at this polling station
over Virendra Singh Lodhi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amit Gaurav | SP | 297 | 48.29% | |
| 2 | Virendra Singh Lodhi | BJP | 166 | 26.99% | |
| 3 | Yogesh Kumar | BSP | 115 | 18.70% | |
| 4 | Arjun Yadav | AAP | 16 | 2.60% | |
| 5 | Tara Rajput | INC | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 6 | Vidhya Verma | IND | 6 | 0.98% | |
| 7 | Anuj Kumar | SBSPS | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | Amit Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | Mukesh | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 10 | Raghuveer Singh | VPI | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Vikas Kumar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Suneeta Shakya | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mamta Singh | RBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 615 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 297 | 47.67% | 1 | 112 | Strong |
| BJP | 166 | 26.65% | 2 | 245 | Average |
| BSP | 115 | 18.46% | 3 | 49 | Weak |
| AAP | 16 | 2.57% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.61% | 5 | 15 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.12% | 6 | 11 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 3 | 0.48% | 7 | 3 | Poor |
| VPI | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 37 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 163 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 223 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 155 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 105, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.