BAIKUNTHI DEVI AGARWAL SIKSHA NIKETAN KAILASHGANJ ETAH HALL DAKSHIN PS 46
Vipin kumar David
BJPBharatiya Janata Party261 votes at this polling station
over Jugendra Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vipin kumar David | BJP | 261 | 56.62% | |
| 2 | Jugendra Singh Yadav | SP | 167 | 36.23% | |
| 3 | Ajay Singh | BSP | 14 | 3.04% | |
| 4 | Gunjan Mishra | INC | 10 | 2.17% | |
| 5 | Umeshkant | AAP | 3 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | Roop kishor Shakya | JAP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | Rajiv Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | Satyaprakash | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | Sahab Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Vijendr Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Omendra Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Durgesh Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ravendr Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mahipal | VPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 461 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 261 | 55.89% | 1 | 174 | Strong |
| SP | 167 | 35.76% | 2 | 178 | Average |
| BSP | 14 | 3.00% | 3 | 282 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 2.14% | 4 | 19 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.86% | 5 | 171 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.64% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| VPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 152 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 104, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.